Hippocrates
460 BC – ca. 370 BC was an ancient
Greek physician and is considered
one of the most outstanding figures in
the history of medicine. He is referred
to as the " father of medicine"
The soul is
the same in all living creatures,
although the body of each is different.
Seneca
C.5
- C.E.65
Roman Stoic
philosopher, statesman, dramatist, and
in one work humorist, of the Silver Age
of Latin literature. He was tutor and
later advisor to emperor Nero.
But for the sake of some
little mouthful of meat,
we deprive a soul of the sun and light,
and of that proportion of life and time it had been
born into the world to enjoy.
If true, the Pythagorean
principles as to abstain from flesh, foster innocence;
if ill-founded they at least teach us frugality, and
what loss have you in losing your cruelty? It merely
deprives you of the food of lions and vultures…let us
ask what is best - not what is customary. Let us love
temperance - let us be just - let us refrain from
bloodshed.
Plato
428-347 B.C.
Born in Athens, Greece, he is the best known of the
ancient philosophers and helped to establish the
foundations of Western philosophy.
The gods created certain
kinds of beings to replenish our bodies...
they are the trees and the plants and the seeds.
Plutarch
AD 46 – 120
Greek historian, philosopher, essayist and biographer.
He authored a number of treatises on matters of
ethics on topics such as education, marriage, religious
observances and also upon the status of animals which
included discussion on the presence of reason in non
human animals and the practice of ethical vegetarianism.
Of particular note is his essay: On the Eating of
Animal Flesh, Book 12, The Moralia
Can you really ask what
reason Pythagoras had for abstaining from flesh? For my
part I rather wonder both by what accident and in what
state of soul or mind the first man did so, touched his
mouth to gore and brought his lips to the flesh of a
dead creature, he who set forth tables of dead, stale
bodies and ventured to call food and nourishment the
parts that had a little before bellowed and cried, moved
and lived. How could his eyes endure the slaughter when
throats were slit and hides flayed and limbs torn from
limb? How could his nose endure the stench? How was it
that the pollution did not turn away his taste, which
made contact with the sores of others and sucked juices
and serums from mortal wounds?… It is certainly not
lions and wolves that we eat out of self-defense; on the
contrary, we ignore these and slaughter harmless, tame
creatures without stings or teeth to harm us, creatures
that, I swear, Nature appears to have produced for the
sake of their beautyand grace. But nothing abashed us,
not the flower-like tinting of the flesh, not the
persuasiveness of the harmonious voice, not the
cleanliness of their habits or the unusual intelligence
that may be found in the poor wretches. No, for the sake
of a little flesh we deprive them of sun, of light, of
the duration of life to which they are entitled by birth
and being.
If you declare that you are
naturally designed for such a diet, then first kill for
yourself what you want to eat. Do it, however, only
through your own resources, unaided by cleaver or cudgel
or any kind of ax
The obligations of law and
equity reach only to mankind;
but kindness and beneficence should be extended
to the creatures of every species,
and these will flow from the breast of a true man,
as streams that issue from the living fountain.
Note that the eating of flesh is not only physically
against nature, but it also makes us spiritually coarse
and gross by reason of satiety and surfeit.
Bion of Borysthenes,
325-c. 250 BC
was a Greek
philosopher. After being sold into slavery, and then
released, he moved to Athens, where he studied in almost
every school of philosophy available.
Though boys throw stones at
frogs in sport, the frogs do not die in sport, but in
earnest.
Bion, Water
and Land Animals,"
Socrates
469 BC–399 BC
was a Classical Greek philosopher and is credited as one
of the founders of Western philosophy.
Contained in Plato’s Republic
is the account of Socrates', debate with Glaucon, Plato's elder
brother, on the issue that meat eating was inhumane,
unethical, unhealthy, and would lead to unhappiness, war and
social justice. The following is a most compelling
argument
Socrates: Would this habit
of eating animals not require that we slaughter animals
that we knew as individuals, and in whose eyes we could
gaze and see ourselves reflected, only a few hours
before our meal?
Glaucon: This habit would
require that of us.
Socrates: Wouldn't this
[knowledge of our role in turning a being into a thing]
hinder us in achieving happiness?
Glaucon: It could so hinder
us in our quest for happiness.
Socrates: And, if we pursue
this way of living, will we not have need to visit the
doctor more often?
Glaucon: We would have such
need.
Socrates: If we pursue our
habit of eating animals, and if our neighbor follows a
similar path, will we not have need to go to war against
our neighbor to secure greater pasturage, because ours
will not be enough to sustain us, and our neighbor will
have a similar need to wage war on us for the same
reason?
Glaucon: We would be so
compelled.
Socrates: Would not these
facts prevent us from achieving happiness, and therefore
the conditions necessary to the building of a just
society, if we pursue a desire to eat animals?
Glaucon: Yes, they would so
prevent us.
Quoted by Plato in The Republic
Ancient Chinese verse
For hundreds of thousands of years the stew in the
pot
Has brewed hatred and resentment that is difficult to
stop.
If you wish to know why there are disasters of armies
and weapons in the world,
Listen to the piteous cries from the slaughter house at
midnight.
Moses Maimonides
Born in Cordoba, Spain on March 30,
1135, and died in Egypt on December 13, 1204, was
a preeminent medieval Jewish philosopher and one of the
greatest Torah scholars of the Middle Ages. He worked as
a rabbi, physician, and philosopher in Spain, Morocco
and Egypt
There is no difference between the pain
of humans and the pain of other living
beings, since the love and tenderness of
the mother for the young are not
produced by reasoning, but by feeling,
and this faculty exists not only in
humans but in most living beings.
Guide for the Perplexed
It should not be believed that all beings exist for
the sake of the existence of man. On the contrary, all
the other beings too have been intended for their own
sakes and not for the sake of anything else.
Guide for the Perplexed
Voltaire
1694 – 1778
was a French Enlightenment writer, essayist, and
philosopher known for his wit and his defence of civil
liberties, including both freedom of religion and free
trade.
People must have renounced,
it seems to me, all natural intelligence to dare to
advance that animals are but animated machines.... It
appears to me, besides, that [such people] can never
have observed with attention the character of animals,
not to have distinguished among them the different
voices of need, of suffering, of joy, of pain, of love,
of anger, and of all their affections. It would be very
strange that they should express so well what they could
not feel.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Jean Jacques Rousseau
1712- 1778 born in Geneva Switzerland was a French
philosopher, writer, and composer of the
eighteenth-century Enlightenment, whose political
philosophy influenced the French Revolution and the
development of modern political and educational thought.
The animals you eat are not those who devour others; you
do not eat the carnivorous beasts, you take them as your
pattern. You only hunger for the sweet and gentle
creatures which harm no one, which follow you, serve
you, and are devoured by you as the reward of their
service.
Jeremy Bentham
1748 – 1832 born in Spitalfields, London was a English
jurist, philosopher, and legal and social reformer.
The question is not, "Can
they reason?" nor, "Can they talk?" but rather, "Can
they suffer?"
Immanuel Kant
1724–1804 German philosopher was one of the most influential philosophers in the
history of Western philosophy. His contributions to
metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics have
had a profound impact on almost every philosophical
movement that followed him
cruelty to animals is
contrary to man's duty to himself, because it deadens in
him the feeling of sympathy for their sufferings, and
thus a natural tendency that is very useful to morality
in relation to other human beings is weakened.
If [man] is not to stifle
his human feelings, he must practise kindness towards
animals, for he who is cruel to animals becomes hard
also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of
a man by his treatment of animals
Arthur Schopenhauer
1788 - 1860 was a German Philosopher known for his
atheistic pessimism and philosophical clarity. At age
25, he published his doctoral dissertation, On the
Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason
The assumption that animals
are without rights and the illusion that our treatment
of them has no moral significance is a positively
outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity.
Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality.
Henry David Thoreau
Henry David Thoreau, 1817– 1862, was an
American author, poet, naturalist, surveyor, historian, philosopher,
and leading transcendentalist. He is best known for his
book Walden, a reflection upon simple living in natural
surroundings, and his essay, Civil Disobedience, an
argument for individual resistance to civil government
in moral opposition to an unjust state.
I have no doubt that it is a
part of the destiny of the human race, in its gradual
improvement, to leave off eating animals, as surely as
the savage tribes have left off eating each other when
they came in contact with the more civilized.
Walden: Life in the woods
No humane being, past the
thoughtless age of boyhood, will wantonly murder any
creature which holds its life by the same tenure that he
does.
I saw a muskrat come out of a hole in the ice ...
While I am looking at him, I am thinking what he is
thinking of me. He is a different sort of man, that's
all.
The squirrel that you kill in jest, dies in earnest.
Every man who has ever been
earnest to preserve
his higher or poetic faculties in the best condition,
has been particularly inclined to abstain from animal
food
I have no doubt that it is a
part of the destiny of the human race, in its gradual
improvement, to leave off eating animals, as surely as
the savage tribes have left off eating each other...."
I have just been through the
process of killing a cistudo for the sake of science;
but I cannot excuse myself for this murder, and see that
such actions are inconsistent with the poetic
perception, however they may serve science, and will
affect the quality of my observations. I pray that I may
walk more innocently and serenely through nature. No
reasoning whatever reconciles me to this act. It affects
my day injuriously. I have lost some self-respect. I
have a murderer's experience to a degree.
One farmer says to me, 'You cannot live on vegetable
food solely, for it furnishes nothing to make the bones
with;' and so he religiously devotes a part of his day
to supplying himself with the raw material of bones;
walking all the while he talks behind his oxen, which,
with vegetable-made bones, jerk him and his lumbering plow along in spite of every obstacle.
Leo Tolstoy,
Count
Leo Nikolayevich Tolstoy, 1828 - 1910 is best known as
one of Russias greatest novelists, most well know of his
novels being War and peace and Anna Karenina. He was
also a contemporary of Russian writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky
another advocate of vegetarianism and animal rights.
Tolstoy was however more than a writer he was a moral
philosopher, a humanitarian, a mystic.
A man can live and be
healthy without killing animals for food; therefore, if
he eats meat, he participates in taking animal life
merely for the sake of his appetite. And to act so is
immoral.
As long as there are
slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields
If a man earnestly seeks
a righteous life,
his first act of abstinence is from animal food
What I think about
vivisection is that if people admit that they have the
right to take or endanger the life of living beings for
the benefit of many, there will be no limit to their
cruelty."
A man can live and be
healthy without killing animals for food; therefore, if
he eats meat, he participates in taking animal life
merely for the sake of his appetite. And to act so is
immoral.
"'Thou shalt not kill' does not apply to murder of one's
own kind only, but to all living beings; and this
Commandment was inscribed in the human breast long
before it was proclaimed from Sinai.
Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 1872 – 1970 Trellech, Monmouthshire was a British philosopher,
logician, mathematician, historian, socialist, pacifist
and social theorist.
"It has been said that man
is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching
for evidence which could support this.
Albert Schweitzer 1875-1965
medical missionary, philosopher, musician and Nobel peace
prize winner in 1953 for his philosophy of "Reverence
for Life".
Very little of the great
cruelty shown by men can really be attributed to cruel
instinct. Most of it comes from thoughtlessness or
inherited habit. The roots of cruelty, therefore, are
not so much strong as widespread. But the time must
come when inhumanity protected by custom and
thoughtlessness will succumb before humanity championed
by thought. Let us work that this time may come.
Think occasionally of the
suffering of which you spare yourself the sight.
Until he
extends the circle of his compassion to
all living things, man will not himself
find peace.
We need a
boundless ethics which will include
animals also.
We have no right to inflict suffering
and death on another living creature
unless there is some unavoidable
necessity for it, and that we ought all
of us feel what a horrible thing it is
to cause suffering and death out of mere
thoughtlessness. And this conviction has
influenced me only more and more
strongly with time. I have grown more
and more certain that at the bottom of
our heart we all think this, and that we
fail to acknowledge it and to carry our
belief into practice chiefly as
sentimentalists, though partly also
because we allow our best feelings to
get blunted. But I vowed that I would
never let my feelings get blunted, and
that I would never be afraid of the
reproach of sentimentalism.
To affirm life is to deepen, to make
more inward, and to exalt the
will-to-life. At the same time the man
who has become a thinking being feels a
compulsion to give every will-to-live
the same reverence for life that he
gives to his own. He experiences that
other life as his own. He accepts as
being good: to preserve life, to raise
to its highest value life which is
capable of development; and as being
evil: to destroy life, to injure life,
to repress life which is capable of
development. This is the absolute,
fundamental principle of the moral, and
it is a necessity of thought."
The thinking [person] must oppose all cruel customs
no matter how deeply rooted in tradition and surrounded
by a halo. When we have a choice, we must avoid bringing
torment and injury into the life of another...
Sri Aurobindo
1872-1950 was an Indian nationalist and freedom fighter,
poet, philosopher, and yogi. Between 1905 to 1910 he
joined the movement for India's freedom from British
rule . He developed his own philosophy of human progress
and spiritual evolution.
Life is life - whether in a
cat, or dog or man. There is no difference there between
a cat or a man. The idea of difference is a human
conception for man's own advantage.
Mohandas Gandhi
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi 2 October 1869 - 1948
was born in Porbandar, a coastal town in
present-day Gujarat, India. He was the pre-eminent
political and spiritual leader of India. He was commonly
called by the honorific Mahatma Gandhi, which means
great soul. Best known for his non violent struggle for
India's freedom during the Indian independence movement.
I abhor vivisection with my
whole soul. All the scientific discoveries stained with
innocent blood I count as of no consequence.
It is very significant
that some of the most
thoughtful and cultured men
are partisans of a pure vegetable diet
The greatness of a nation
and its moral progress can be judged by the way its
animals are treated
I do feel that spiritual
progress does demand at some stage that we should cease
to kill our fellow creatures for the satisfaction of our
bodily wants.
It is necessary to correct the error that vegetarianism
has made us weak in mind, or passive or inert in action.
I do not regard flesh-food as necessary at any stage
I still believe that man,
not having been given the power of creation, does not
posses the right of destroying the meanest creature that
lives. The perogative of destruction belongs solely to
the Creator of all that lives.
To my mind, the life of a lamb is no less precious than
that of a human being. I should be unwilling to take the
life of a lamb for the sake of the human body.
Complete non-violence is complete absence of ill-will
against all that lives. It therefore embraces even
sub-human life, not excluding noxious insects and
beasts. They have not been created to feed our
destructive propensities. If we only knew the mind of
the Creator, we should find their proper place in His
creation.